teakettle31

A Site To Catalog My Aircraft Adventures

  • About
    • About This Website
    • About Me
    • About My Favorite Aircraft
  • Aircraft I’ve Flown Organized By…
    • Mil/Civ Type
      • Airplane Single-engine Piston
      • Airplane Multi-engine Piston
      • Airplane Single-engine Turboprop
      • Airplane Multi-engine Turboprop
      • Tactical Jets
      • Large Jets
      • Business Jets
      • Helicopters
      • Gliders
      • Lighter than air
      • Other
    • Order Flown
      • Order Flown: 1-25
      • Order Flown: 26-50
      • Order Flown: 51-75
      • Order Flown: 76-100
      • Order Flown 101-125
      • Order Flown: 126-150
      • Order Flown: 151-175
      • Order Flown: 176+
  • Other Content
    • Favorite Links
    • Documents
    • My Store
  • Flight Test Services

Cessna 335

January 27, 2025 by Bob Stoney Leave a Comment

Aircraft Information
> Aircraft Make: Cessna Model: 335 Nickname: I’m not aware of one. Anyone know?
> Aircraft Mil Civ Description: Airplane ME Piston
> FAA Category and Class: Airplane multi-engine land
> Engine Description: twin piston

Aircraft Experience
> As of: 11/3/2024
> Number of Hours Flown: 26
> Number of Times Flown: 12
> Other Aircraft Models Associated: Cessna 310, 340

First Flown Information
> Sequence First Flown: 150
> Date First Flown: 8/6/2004
> Location First Flown: Mid-continent airport, Wichita, KS (KICT)
> Who and/or What Organization First Flown With: FAA Rental at Yingling Aviation, Ralph Rissmiller

Recollections: The Cessna 335 was an early UNPRESSURIZED version of the Cessna 340 airplane.  Like the Baron I’d flown as an FAA currency aircraft, I enjoyed checking out and flying the Cessna 335, an airplane that attempted to directly compete with the Baron.  Why the Baron survives and the 340 doesn’t are a mystery to me.  The 335 was probably a touch easier to fly (not as heavy) and, having an airstair entrance with a center aisle, was more comfortable than the Baron when loading passengers.  The Baron’s longevity may have more to do with other airplanes being manufactured on the line…while Cessna had a very successful line of jets, and the turbine-powered Caravan, cross-town rival Beechcraft struggled to consistently field commercially successful designs. 

My checkout in the 335 came from fellow FAA Test Pilot Ralph Rissmiller, who had a real gift of instruction, and who was the “go to guy” in the office for avionics-related projects.  His background as an avionics engineer helped him to be very knowledgeable as he became a tester, and ultimately a Test Pilot.

Cessna 335, N355TS (stock photo)
(c) aircraft.com

Filed Under: 126-150, Airplane ME Piston

Beechcraft BE-55 Baron

January 27, 2025 by Bob Stoney Leave a Comment

Aircraft Information
> Aircraft Make: Beecraft Model: BE-55 Nickname: Baron
> Aircraft Mil Civ Description: Airplane ME Piston
> FAA Category and Class: Airplane Multi-engine Land
> Engine Description: twin piston

Aircraft Experience
> As of: 11/3/2024
> Number of Hours Flown: 26
> Number of Times Flown: 9
> Other Aircraft Models Associated: BE-58 Baron, numerous models of BE-55

First Flown Information
> Sequence First Flown: 129
> Date First Flown: 9/10/2002
> Location First Flown: James Jabara Airport, Wichita, KS (KAAO)
> Who and/or What Organization First Flown With: FAA Rental, Kevin Campbell

Recollections: The BE-55 Baron, it could be argued, should be lumped in with my other entry for the BE-58.  I chose to separate it because the 55 has 4 seats instead of 6, has 40 less Horsepower per engine and, mostly, because my logbook shows my first flight was with fellow FAA Test Pilot Kevin Campbell.  Back to Kevin in a second.

The 55 was less complex (no pressurization, for example) than the 55 and it felt lighter and more maneuverable.  Apparently, my time in the 58 “counted” for 55, as I appear to have received no flight checkout in the 55.  

Beechcraft Baron BE-55 (stock photo)
(c) Airliners.net

One thing I remember well, besides really liking the 55’s flying qualifies, is that it had a red warning light in the middle of the instrument panel. A single light.  Red.  When did the light come on?  When the gear was SAFELY UP.  That meant that, most of the time you were flying it, you had a giant red light in the middle of the panel.  Just like “low oil pressure” or “low fuel pressure” or “Unsafe gear” lights I’d seen in dozens of other airplanes.  I only flew the BE-55 9 times but I remember to this day the alarm I felt everytime I was scanning….”RED LIGHT, WHAT’S WRONG!?!!”   Oh, nothing….the gear is up.  This informed my opinion, a decade later, when the FAA published a new rule concerning alerting for transport category airplanes.  This new rule, 14CFR25.1322 (amendment 131 for those in the know), which includes:  “Visual alert indications must conform to the following color convention: Red for warning alert indications.” and “Warning: For conditions that require immediate flightcrew awareness and immediate flightcrew response.” (your gear being up doesn’t, unless you’re 10 feet from landing, but c’mon) and “Use of the colors red, amber, and yellow on the flight deck for functions other than flightcrew alerting must be limited and must not adversely affect flightcrew alerting.”

So, back to Kevin Campbell.  Kevin was my mentor for all things FAA.  Coming out of the Navy I knew a bit about flight testing, but not much about civilian flight testing, or the FAA processes.  Kevin–without anyone telling him to do it–kind of “adopted” me as I learned the FAA way.  He was extremely patient and thorough as he showed me the ropes.  I also learned a lot just by watching Kevin interact with the companies who were working to get their products certified.  Kevin was super steady, but dogged in his pursuit of facts.  His integrity was perfect.  And, while he described himself variously as a “Dirt Farmer” or “2nd Lieutenant Campbell”, he did NOT miss a beat or a fact…one of the smartest guys I know, capable of remembering facts/statements and synthesizing them into meaningful issues.  Any success I had in the FAA I owe to Kevin (and to our boss, Gerry Baker, who–while he wasn’t as much a day-to-day part of my FAA work, was the true expert on all things related to our jobs). When I was retiring from the Navy and decided that the FAA Test Pilot job was where I wanted to be, I originally wanted to go to the Seattle office. Unfortunately there weren’t any openings in Seattle…but there was in Wichita and I decided to go there. I worked there for 3 years, before moving to Seattle with the FAA. In retrospect, I feel lucky to  have stumbled into Wichita…for MANY reasons. Great programs, great companies but–mostly–great people, including Kevin, Gerry and the wonderful friends we made in the community. As the saying goes…”Even a blind squirrel finds a nut every now and then.” This one sure did.

Filed Under: 126-150, Airplane ME Piston

Beechcraft BE-58 Baron

January 27, 2025 by Bob Stoney Leave a Comment

Aircraft Information
> Aircraft Make: Beechcraft Model: BE-58 Nickname: Baron
> Aircraft Mil Civ Description: Airplane ME Piston
> FAA Category and Class: Airplane Multi-engine Land
> Engine Description: piston twin

Aircraft Experience
> As of: 11/3/2024
> Number of Hours Flown: 53
> Number of Times Flown: 22
> Other Aircraft Models Associated: BE-58P, other Baron models (including the BE-55)

First Flown Information
> Sequence First Flown: 126
> Date First Flown: 7/16/2002
> Location First Flown: New Century Airport, Olathe, KS (KIXD)
> Who and/or What Organization First Flown With: Bendix King Avionics, Lloyd Bingham

Recollections: My first flight in the Baron was with Lloyd Bingham, a long-time Designated Engineering Representative (DER) Test Pilot with whom–now 22 years later–I’m still working.  He’s a true gentleman and role model.  Our first flight together was to take a “quick look” at an electronic Horizontal Situation Indicator (HSI), the KMH-825.  I feel lucky to have been able to work with “Bendix King” (later bought by Honeywell) and Garmin. Both of these company’s General Aviation effort in the 1990’s and 2000’s was at the Olathe, KS airport. It made for some good competition and being able to work with each of them was interesting.

Not long after my first flight, I also got checked out in a rental Baron and flew it enough to appreciate this solid design that–unlike any other multi-engine piston airplane–is still being manufactuered in the US.  This longevity is a testament to the design. 

Beechcraft BE-58P Baron N344RE (stock photo)
(c) aircraft.com

I got in trouble with the FAA while flying a Baron.  I flew a Baron from Wichita to Iowa for a project.  Before I tookoff from Wichita, I verified (in an informal “aircraft book” contained in the airplane) that the 100 hour inspection was current (less than 100 hrs).  When I arrived in Iowa, I got a call from the man who managed the airplane’s rental (he was not the owner, just an intermediary), who advised me that “the annual is out of date”.  The annual date was NOT in the “aircraft book” (though it certainly was in the aircraft’s maintenance logbook which was stored somewhere in somebody’s hangar or office.  I was pretty new to the pure civilian world and so  I asked him what my options were….he said “no problem, just call the FAA FSDO and get a ferry permit to bring it home, we’ll do the annual when you bring it back.”  Cool.  So, I called a guy I’d worked a bit with at the Wichita FSDO.  Let’s call him “Jack”.  I explained the situation to Jack.  His response:  “Bob, are you self-disclosing a possible violation of the FAR’s to me?”  I literally moved the phone receiver away from my face and stared at it in disbelief.  “Jack, what’s the right answer to that question?”  Jack said I should say Yes…so I did.  I finished my business in Iowa, got a rental car and drove to the nearest commercial airport and got on a United flight back to Wichita, leaving the Baron in Iowa.  I also filed an ASRS form (this NASA form is somewhat of a “get out of jail free” process that gives you some protection from FAA enforcement).  One thing led to another and my “punishment” was a 1 year “double secret probation” with the FAA and remedial training wherein I was to fully research the responsibilities of the Pilot in Command as it related to aircraft airworthiness and to report my research to my Safety Officer in the office where I worked.  Well, it turned out that this safety officer (and, in fact, every other Test Pilot in our office) had flown the airplane out of annual as well (it was about a month overdue)…but we never told Jack that.  I gladly took the fall.  I also learned (it was actually good learning) that, as the PIC, I was the one responsible for compliance to all maintenance standards, which was quite different from my Navy experience where the maintenance folks were responsible.  I guess I was supposed to read the logbooks, ensure all AD’s in compliance, annual current, etc.  Now, the reality is that MOST pilots of rental airplanes DON’T do this, they depend on the company or FBO renting the airplane to keep up with these requirements and to publish them in an accurate and COMPLETE “aircraft book”.  You basically have to trust them.  The guy who managed the Baron rental was not trustworthy and the FAA pilots in Wichita never rented from him again.

So, the Baron’s a nice plane and it inadvertently taught me some good lessons about the FAA airworthiness process!

Filed Under: 126-150, Airplane ME Piston

Cirrus SR20, SR22

January 27, 2025 by Bob Stoney Leave a Comment

Aircraft Information
> Aircraft Make: Cirrus Aircraft Model: SR 20 & 22 Nickname: The plane with a parachute
> Aircraft Mil Civ Description: Airplane SE Piston
> FAA Category and Class: Airplane Single Engine Land
> Engine Description: single piston

Aircraft Experience
> As of: 11/5/2024
> Number of Hours Flown: 31
> Number of Times Flown: 21
> Other Aircraft Models Associated: SR20 and 22 with various sub-models (eg: “G2”, “G3”)

First Flown Information
> Sequence First Flown: 135
> Date First Flown: 4/14/2003
> Location First Flown: New Century Air Center, Olathe, KS (KIXD)
> Who and/or What Organization First Flown With: Garmin flight test, Phil Straub

Recollections: My first flight in a Cirrus SR2X was on an FAA test flight to evaluate the new G1000 avionics system.  Later I flew it as a rental with several FBO’s (each requiring a special checkout from a Cirrus-authorized instructor…showing the somewhat challenging flying qualities of the cirrus), and as a student at NTPS.

Cirrus SR22 N725CD, Garmin (stock photo)
(c) flickr.com

The Cirrus is, for sure, an amazing cross-country airplane.  Coupled with the advanced avionics (either the Garmin or the Avidyne systems) it’s just an excellent way to get from A to B.  That said, I never really liked the way it handled.  It has a mechanical sidestick, which leaves room in the cockpit for your legs and gives you a wide-open view of the instruments, but there’s a disharmony between pitch and roll controls and it’s difficult to precisely control the airplane.  It’s totally safe, just not fun or easy to fly.  As is often the case in aviation, you can’t have it all.  Aircraft design is a tradeoff.  The Cirrus trade is in favor of performance and it truly achieves that goal.  It’s CAPS (Cirrus Airframe Parachute System) also has been revolutionary in the private airplane market, achieving a number of saves.  

Cirrus SR22 N243SR, National Test Pilot School (stock photo)
(c) NTPS.edu

Filed Under: 126-150, Airplane SE Piston

Piper PA-18 Super Cub

January 24, 2025 by Bob Stoney Leave a Comment

Aircraft Information
> Aircraft Make: Piper. Model: PA-18. Nickname: Super Cub
> Aircraft Mil Civ Description: Airplane SE Piston
> FAA Category and Class: Airplane Single Engine Land (and Sea)
> Engine Description: single piston

Aircraft Experience
> As of: 11/4/2024
> Number of Hours Flown: 94
> Number of Times Flown: 47
> Other Aircraft Models Associated: J-3, various L-birds

First Flown Information
> Sequence First Flown: 147
> Date First Flown: 6/4/2004
> Location First Flown: Kenmore Air Harbor, WA
> Who and/or What Organization First Flown With: Kenmore Air, Kevin Thomson

Recollections: This entry includes “Super Cubs” manufactured by Piper, as well as sijmilar-looking but newly made and improved Super Cubs built by Cubcrafters of Yakima, WA.  My Cubcrafters flying included certification flight tests and production audits.  

My first supercub flight was in a Seaplane at Kenmore Aviation.  

N390CC at Kenmore (Cubcrafters Super Cub)
(c) jetphotos.com

Most of my Super Cub flights are in one airplane, N333TM, a tow plane operated by the Puget Sound Soaring Association (PSSA), near my home in Seattle.  As of this writing, I’ve towed 311 gliders airborne and look forward to many more years of towing out of this gorgeous, one-way-in-opposite-way-out field nestled against the first line of ridges on the west side of the Cascade Mountains. My logbook shows 57 flights but that’s because flights are all lumped into one day when you’re doing tow operation. I’ve flown N333TM 45 times but done 311 tows.

Piper PA-18 Tow plan N333TM glider in tow at Bergseth
(c) pugetsoundsoaring
Bergseth Field, WA with P-18 N333TM taking off to the west
(c) Bob Stoney
Life of the Tow Pilot
(c) Bob Stoney

Filed Under: 126-150, Airplane SE Piston

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next Page »

Recent Comments

  • Bob Stoney on Raytheon 390 Premier I

Contact Me.

Click Here.

Visitor Count

5386

Copyright © 2025 · Outreach Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in